I support regulated sectors

... [Jen] has excellent written and verbal communication skills, is extremely organized, works well independently, and shows great individual initiative… Jennifer’s responsibilities were constantly evolving along with the project... Jennifer always maintained her objectivity and remained focused on a positive outcome for the researchers... [Jen] maintained an excellent rapport with the many constituents served by our project team.

Jennifer was really great to work with. She brought huge energy and drive and was delivering results immediately. This required understanding of the science and converting it to industry ready material. She was completely self-motivated, only had to define the objectives and she produced the results time and again. This technical competence, attention to detail and commitment to task make her a great asset to any team.

[Jen] is ... competent, well organized and hard‐working. She is extremely determined and showed good perseverance in overcoming the problems which always arise in scientific research, finding creative solutions and generating many new ideas... [Jen] is capable of both writing and speaking well about science. In personal terms, she is always cheerful, even in the face of setbacks, and interacts well with others...

... [Jen is] articulate, very conscientious, highly intelligent and very motivated. She has a strong desire to get to grips with any task that she is given and she was able to complete her tasks to agreed deadlines. She has good interpersonal skills, got on well with everybody, and is a team player. I found Jen to be highly self-motivated and she worked productively under her own initiative requiring little supervision...

... [Jen’s] work predominantly involved review of the clinical evaluation process, and review of clinical papers for products including surgical instrumentation, implants and software. This required her to cover a wide range of technical areas and to interact with a number of project teams. Jennifer addressed these tasks with a high degree of technical competency...

Jen has a lot of relevant knowledge and enthusiasm to learn, which has helped enormously. She is highly motivated, communicative, and efficient at turning around assignments, asking for clarification when necessary and delivering on time.

Jen is great to work with and very passionate about regulatory and writing. We successfully navigated through challenging intel work and impressed the client with our final deliverables.

... [Jen is] our “go to” person for jobs outside our formal job descriptions...

[Jen's] diligent work on various Regulatory Validation and Clinical Review accounts is highly appreciated and recommended by project teams. Projects were always delivered on time and [Jen's] professional comments facilitated the teams' work, and further achieved client satisfaction.

... [Jennifer] has an exceptional eye for detail, ensuring that every aspect of my work met the highest standards of clarity and precision. Her meticulous approach, combined with her deep understanding of complex scientific concepts, made the entire writing process seamless and enjoyable. Beyond her technical expertise, Jennifer is incredibly easy to work with. She is always approachable, open to feedback, and proactive in finding solutions.

I really enjoyed working with Jen when she was helping to share the CMC regulatory/quality dialogue at International Pharmaceutical Quality (IPQ). She was always great to talk to, suggesting ideas and open to feedback, extremely efficient, punctual, and accurate. I would highly recommend working with her.

I had the pleasure of working with Jennifer on publications for EMWA, where she serves as Associate Editor and Biotechnology Section Editor. She was always professional, providing insightful feedback. Her keen eye for detail and constructive approach made collaborating with her a great experience.